Case Report
Quality assurance in a rehabilitation service
South African Journal of Physiotherapy | Vol 57, No 1 | a488 |
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/sajp.v57i1.488
| © 2018 H. Myezwa, V. R. M'kumbuzi, F. Mhuri
| This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 30 August 2018 | Published: 28 February 2001
Submitted: 30 August 2018 | Published: 28 February 2001
About the author(s)
H. Myezwa, Regional Co-ordinator, GTZ-Health Systems Research, ZimbabweV. R. P. M'kumbuzi, Faculty of Medicine, University of Zimbabwe, Zimbabwe
F. Mhuri, Faculty of Medicine, University of Zimbabwe, Zimbabwe
Full Text:
PDF (283KB)Abstract
Aim: The aim of this study was to develop, implement and evaluate a Quality Assurance (QA) programme for use by nine rehabilitation departments in the Midlands province of Zimbabwe.
Methodology: A participatory methodology was implemented to:
1. Define and implement the parameters of quality for a rehabilitation service.
2. Design standardised assessment forms for the different conditions managed.
3. Develop, pilot and evaluate a QA measuring instrument to use in defining the QA profile of a rehabilitation service, and
4. Determine patient satisfaction with the rehabilitation service. Administering a simple questionnaire, whose design was based on the Zimbabwe Patients Charter, accomplished this.
Results: The process of developing, implementing and evaluation of the QA programme took six years. One year after implementation of the QA, all (J00%) patients coming into contact with the service had a rehabilitation record. The QA profile for the Midlands province rose from 55% in 1994 to a record high of 92.1% in 1998, and 89.4% in 1999. The patient satisfaction profile for each indicator also demonstrated a linear increase with areas such as satisfaction with service rising from 86% in 1997 to 100% in 2000, and satisfaction with benefit from the service rising from 76.6% in 1997 to 100% in 2000. Other qualitative benefits not depicted by the QA measuring instrument or the patient satisfaction instrument, but which were observed and expressed by rehabilitation staff as measures of success of the QA programme are discussed.
Conclusion: This paper concludes that significant improvements in clinical documentation arising from the QA programme, translated to an overall increase in the service providers’ professional skills and knowledge base, and ultimately rehabilitation outcomes. The success of this process is attributed to its participatory and empowering nature.
Methodology: A participatory methodology was implemented to:
1. Define and implement the parameters of quality for a rehabilitation service.
2. Design standardised assessment forms for the different conditions managed.
3. Develop, pilot and evaluate a QA measuring instrument to use in defining the QA profile of a rehabilitation service, and
4. Determine patient satisfaction with the rehabilitation service. Administering a simple questionnaire, whose design was based on the Zimbabwe Patients Charter, accomplished this.
Results: The process of developing, implementing and evaluation of the QA programme took six years. One year after implementation of the QA, all (J00%) patients coming into contact with the service had a rehabilitation record. The QA profile for the Midlands province rose from 55% in 1994 to a record high of 92.1% in 1998, and 89.4% in 1999. The patient satisfaction profile for each indicator also demonstrated a linear increase with areas such as satisfaction with service rising from 86% in 1997 to 100% in 2000, and satisfaction with benefit from the service rising from 76.6% in 1997 to 100% in 2000. Other qualitative benefits not depicted by the QA measuring instrument or the patient satisfaction instrument, but which were observed and expressed by rehabilitation staff as measures of success of the QA programme are discussed.
Conclusion: This paper concludes that significant improvements in clinical documentation arising from the QA programme, translated to an overall increase in the service providers’ professional skills and knowledge base, and ultimately rehabilitation outcomes. The success of this process is attributed to its participatory and empowering nature.
Keywords
quality assurance; rehabilitation service
Metrics
Total abstract views: 1255Total article views: 821
Crossref Citations
1. Retrieving physiotherapy patient records in selected health care facilities in South Africa – is record keeping compromised?
Vyvienne RP M'kumbuzi, Seyi L Amosun, Aimee V Stewart
Disability and Rehabilitation vol: 26 issue: 18 first page: 1110 year: 2004
doi: 10.1080/09638280410001709282