Original Research
Blended teaching versus traditional teaching for undergraduate physiotherapy students at the University of the Witwatersrand
Submitted: 01 December 2020 | Published: 17 May 2021
About the author(s)
Sadiya Ravat, Department of Physiotherapy, School of Therapeutic Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South AfricaPaula Barnard-Ashton, eFundanathi, School of Therapeutic Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
Monique M. Keller, Department of Physiotherapy, School of Therapeutic Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
Abstract
Background: Shifting from face-to-face teaching to incorporating technology may prepare students better for future work as health professionals. Evidence of blended teaching’s effect on the academic performance of undergraduate physiotherapy students’ performance is scarce.
Objective: The purpose of our study was to determine students’ theoretical and clinical performance in a blended teaching module compared to their own performance in two knowledge areas taught face to face, and student perceptions of blended teaching in the third-year physiotherapy curriculum.
Methods: The cross-sectional study design included 47 third-year physiotherapy students. The orthopaedic module was delivered using a blended teaching approach in two consecutive semesters, whilst two other physiotherapy knowledge areas, neuromusculoskeletal and cardiopulmonary, in the same semesters were delivered face to face. Theoretical and clinical performances of students were compared for significance and effect. Students were assessed on their theoretical and clinical knowledge in all areas using the same assessment methods. The students (n = 43) also completed a survey on their blended teaching experience.
Results: Significantly higher theoretical marks for orthopaedics were calculated compared to neuromusculoskeletal and cardiopulmonary for both semesters with a large positive effect (average Cohen d = 4.44) for blended teaching on theoretical examination performance; no statistically significant difference for clinical performances. Students felt engaged in the blended teaching process, and 72% preferred blended teaching over face-to-face teaching or online delivery.
Conclusion: Blended teaching improved the theoretical marks, demonstrating that knowledge acquisition was improved, but not clinical performance.
Clinical implications: The study contributes to the knowledge base of blended learning in Health Science Education in South Africa. The authors identified a gap where future studies should investigate the effect of blended learning on clinical performance outcomes as a continuation from this one.
Keywords
Metrics
Total abstract views: 6595Total article views: 5816
Crossref Citations
1. Post-Pandemic Hybrid Learning Trends in Higher Education and its Implications in Students’ Academic Performance
Oscar Menrad Msamba, Naisujaki Sephania Lyimo
East African Journal of Education and Social Sciences vol: 5 issue: 2 year: 2024
doi: 10.46606/eajess2024v05i02.0370
2. Entwicklung eines beispielhaften kompetenzorientierten Blended-Learning-Konzeptes für die Physiotherapie-Ausbildung
Ann Katrin Cordes
physioscience vol: 20 issue: 03 first page: 126 year: 2024
doi: 10.1055/a-2164-5965
3. Effectiveness of blended learning on improving medical student’s learning initiative and performance in the physiology study
Xiaolan Zhang, Haixia Wen, Hui Li, Yujia Huang, Chunmei Lv, Hui Zhu
Cogent Education vol: 10 issue: 1 year: 2023
doi: 10.1080/2331186X.2023.2192150
4. Instructional Design approaches in African Higher Education: A systematic review of emerging trends and practices
Samuel Antwi, Emmanuel D. Appiah, Ralitsa Diana Debrah
Journal of Education and Learning Technology vol: 7 issue: 5 first page: 540 year: 2026
doi: 10.38159/jelt.2026755
5. Overview of styles, content, learning effects and attitudes of students towards digitally enhanced physiotherapy education – a scoping review
Larissa Pagels, Oskar Schindler, Kerstin Luedtke
BMC Medical Education vol: 25 issue: 1 year: 2025
doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-06750-6
6. Pedagogical impact of integration of musculoskeletal anatomy blended learning on physiotherapy education
Arnaud Delafontaine, Gabriel Saiydoun, Jérôme Frigout, Laurent Fabeck, Olivier Degrenne, François-Régis Sarhan
Frontiers in Medicine vol: 10 year: 2023
doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1260416
7. Perceptions of Students and Teachers Regarding Remote and Face-to-Face Assessments in the Evolving Higher Education Landscape
Daniel Humberto Pozza, José Tiago Costa-Pereira, Isaura Tavares
Education Sciences vol: 15 issue: 3 first page: 360 year: 2025
doi: 10.3390/educsci15030360
8. The impacts of learning motivation, emotional engagement and psychological capital on academic performance in a blended learning university course
Yan Liu, Shuai Ma, Yue Chen
Frontiers in Psychology vol: 15 year: 2024
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1357936
9. Mapping Educational Outcomes and Implementation Challenges of Problem-Based Learning Versus Traditional Didactic Teaching in Physiotherapy Curricula: A Scoping Review
Rupali Shevalkar, Bharati Asgaokar, Khyati Kothary, Dhvani Shah
Cureus year: 2026
doi: 10.7759/cureus.112973
10. Student and educator perspectives on clinical reasoning: A qualitative study
Danelle Hess, Jacqueline Hendricks, José Frantz, Michael Rowe
South African Journal of Physiotherapy year: 2025
doi: 10.4102/sajp.v81i1.2161
11. Medical Education: Are Reels a Good Deal in Video-Based Learning?
Daniel Humberto Pozza, Fani Lourença Neto, José Tiago Costa-Pereira, Isaura Tavares
Education Sciences vol: 15 issue: 8 first page: 981 year: 2025
doi: 10.3390/educsci15080981
12. The Use of Blended Teaching in Higher Medical Education during the Pandemic Era
Xue-Tao Fu, Yi Hu, Bing-Chun Yan, Yun-Gen Jiao, Shi-Jun Zheng, Ying-Ge Wang, Jiang-Yun Zhang, Zheng-Bing Wang, B. D. Parameshachari
International Journal of Clinical Practice vol: 2022 issue: 1 year: 2022
doi: 10.1155/2022/3882975
13. “3 + X D” structured report in radiology standardized resident training: Can it meet high-level teaching objectives?
Qingling Yang, Rui Peng, Lina Ma, Ye Han, Lei Yuan, Danqing Yin, Aceng Li, Yang Wang, Minwen Zheng, Yayu Huang, Jing Ren
European Journal of Radiology vol: 181 first page: 111780 year: 2024
doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111780

