Email this article 
Hide
Show all
Original Research
The effects of active and passive neck flexion on unilateral straight-leg-raising
South African Journal of Physiotherapy | Vol 46, No 1 | a796 |
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/sajp.v46i1.796
| © 2018 Copyright Status: Not provided. Contact Holding Institution to verify copyright status. Rights Holder: South African Society of Physiotherapy
Submitted: 28 September 2018 | Published: 28 February 1990
Submitted: 28 September 2018 | Published: 28 February 1990
About the author(s)
Craig Smith,, South AfricaFull Text:
PDF (241KB)Abstract
A study was designed to test the effects of passive neck flexion (PNF) as compared with active neck flexion (ANF) on the straight-leg-raise (SLR) test.
Twenty two subjects were measured three times with a goniometer and the difference in range of movement (ROM) was determined by subtracting the SLR recordings obtained by means of PNF from those of ANF.
Results demonstrated that neck flexion (NF) performed actively allowed a mean value of 4,13° more SLR than when performed passively. The implications of these findings are discussed.
Twenty two subjects were measured three times with a goniometer and the difference in range of movement (ROM) was determined by subtracting the SLR recordings obtained by means of PNF from those of ANF.
Results demonstrated that neck flexion (NF) performed actively allowed a mean value of 4,13° more SLR than when performed passively. The implications of these findings are discussed.
Keywords
No keywords available
Metrics
Total abstract views: 2560Total article views: 1298
