Review Article

Predictors of return to work among mine workers following on-duty injury: A scoping review

Wilinda Botha, Nontembiso Magida, Witness Mudzi, Bashir Bello
South African Journal of Physiotherapy | Vol 81, No 1 | a2165 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/sajp.v81i1.2165 | © 2025 Wilinda Botha, Nontembiso Magida, Witness Mudzi, Bashir Bello | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 03 January 2025 | Published: 30 June 2025

About the author(s)

Wilinda Botha, Department of Physiotherapy, School of Health Care Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
Nontembiso Magida, Department of Physiotherapy, School of Health Care Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
Witness Mudzi, Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
Bashir Bello, Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Bayero University Kano, Kano, Nigeria; and, Lifestyle Disease Research Entity, North-West University, Mafikeng, South Africa

Abstract

Background: Mining industry workers face substantial challenges returning to work after occupational injuries. Despite the critical importance of successful return to work (RTW) outcomes, there is limited understanding of specific predictors within the mining sector that influence these outcomes.

Objectives: To systematically identify and analyse factors influencing RTW among mine workers following on-duty injuries and synthesise evidence to inform rehabilitation strategies.

Method: We searched PubMed, CINAHL, Google Scholar and PsycINFO databases for literature published between 1996 and December 2024. Studies were screened using predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data from eligible studies were extracted and analysed thematically to identify key predictors of RTW outcomes.

Results: Three studies met the inclusion criteria. Negative RTW predictors (barriers) included physical complications (muscular atrophy, chronic pain), psychological factors (work avoidance, secondary gains) and workplace challenges (harsh conditions, job stress). Positive predictors (facilitators) encompassed supportive work environments, shorter rehabilitation periods, and financial stability. Demographic characteristics, particularly younger age and higher education levels, were associated with improved RTW outcomes.

Conclusion: Return to work success among mine workers is influenced by multiple interconnected factors spanning physical, psychological, workplace and demographic domains.

Clinical implications: These findings emphasise the need for comprehensive rehabilitation programmes integrating medical care, psychological support and workplace modifications. Future research should focus on developing targeted interventions that address these multiple dimensions of RTW in the mining sector.


Keywords

return to work; occupational injury; rehabilitation; injured on duty; predictors; mine-workers

Sustainable Development Goal

Goal 3: Good health and well-being

Metrics

Total abstract views: 188
Total article views: 157


Crossref Citations

No related citations found.