Original Research

Health systems and quality of life: The situation of South Africans with spinal cord injury

Eugene Nizeyimana, Anthea Rhoda, Joyce Mothabeng, Francois Theron, Conran Joseph
South African Journal of Physiotherapy | Vol 81, No 1 | a2133 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/sajp.v81i1.2133 | © 2025 Eugene Nizeyimana, Anthea Rhoda, Joyce Mothabeng, Francois Theron, Conran Joseph | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 25 September 2024 | Published: 06 June 2025

About the author(s)

Eugene Nizeyimana, Department of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa
Anthea Rhoda, Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Community and Health Sciences, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town, South Africa
Joyce Mothabeng, Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
Francois Theron, Meulmed Rehabilitation Hospital, Pretoria, South Africa
Conran Joseph, Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa

Abstract

Background: Spinal cord injury (SCI) significantly impacts quality of life (QoL) through physical disabilities and reduced social participation.

Objectives: This study compared health system indicators, social factors and self-reported QoL between individuals with SCI accessing public versus private healthcare in South Africa.

Method: A cross-sectional survey using the International Spinal Cord Injury (InSCI) community survey questionnaire was conducted with 200 SCI individuals (156 public, 44 private sector) from Cape Town and Pretoria. Chi-square tests and correlation analyses were performed.

Results: Significant disparities were observed between cohorts. Public sector participants reported higher rates of disability pension receipt (82.1% vs 54.5%) and greater challenges accessing various services. Overall, self-reported QoL was 56%, with the private cohort reporting significantly higher satisfaction (64% vs 52%). Private sector participants also reported higher satisfaction with living conditions and personal relationships. Access to disability pension and healthcare negatively correlated with QoL, while access to public spaces, medication, transport and nursing care positively correlated with QoL.

Conclusion: This study reveals significant disparities in health system performance, social factors and QoL between SCI individuals accessing public versus private healthcare in South Africa.

Clinical implications: Findings highlight the need to address systemic inequities in healthcare access and social support for individuals with SCI to improve QoL across sectors.


Keywords

health systems; quality of life; social factors; spinal cord injury; South Africa.

Sustainable Development Goal

Goal 3: Good health and well-being

Metrics

Total abstract views: 150
Total article views: 95


Crossref Citations

No related citations found.