Abstract
Background: Managing children with cerebral palsy (CP) in poorly-resourced contexts, especially those with greater functional limitations, is challenging. Unmitigated orthopaedic complications can further restrict already compromised functional capacity. Where rehabilitation skills and knowledge are scarce, primary healthcare worker- and caregiver-implemented routines are warranted. The essential elements of a home-based routine to mitigate musculoskeletal (MSK) complications in children with severe CP in resource-limited settings (RLSs) have not been determined.
Objectives: To summarise the evidence for programmes and interventions that mitigate MSK complications in children with severe CP and make recommendations for a programme suited to RLSs.
Method: Scientific databases and professional websites were searched for studies and reports describing guidelines, interventions or programmes for children aged 0–18 years with severe, partially- or non-ambulant CP, that included aims for the prevention of MSK complications. Articles reporting on surgical, pharmacological and advanced or expensive technological interventions were excluded.
Results: A total of 57 studies or reports were included in the review. Low-grade evidence exists for 24-hour postural management (24-h PM), supported standing, sustained stretching and splinting to mitigate MSK complications in children with CP. Caregiver training and support, and integration of the programme into daily routines were identified as important components for successful implementation.
Conclusion: Clinical guidelines and evidence that support caregiver-delivered interventions to reduce MSK complications in children with severe CP are limited, and only weak recommendations can be made.
Clinical implications: There is a need for context-specific, home-based intervention programmes to prevent MSK complications in children with CP in RLSs.
Keywords: cerebral palsy; child; complications/prevention and control; deformities; low-income setting; parent-implemented.
Introduction
As a leading cause of childhood motor disability worldwide, cerebral palsy (CP) is a complex long-term condition that requires coordinated access to medical interventions, rehabilitation and equipment, all of which are often scarce or unavailable in resource-limited settings (RLSs) (Donald et al. 2015).
In low- and middle-income countries (LMIC), the estimated prevalence of CP is between 2 and 10 per 1000 live births, with higher rates in poorer areas (Cans et al. 2008; Couper 2002). Such RLSs likely have higher proportions of the severe types of CP, including bilateral spastic and dyskinetic presentations (Gladstone 2010), which usually occupy the more severe functional levels of the Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) (Palisano et al. 2007), that is, levels III-V that have no or limited ambulatory ability (Shevell et al. 2009). Children with severe impairments often present with higher rates of co-morbidities, for example, feeding difficulties and orthopaedic complications, of which hip displacement, muscle contractures and scoliosis are common (Hollung et al. 2020). Unmitigated, these can further limit functional status and negatively impact quality of life, as illustrated by the World Health Organization’s (WHO) International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health framework (ICF) in Figure 1 (WHO 2002).
 |
FIGURE 1: International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health framework illustrating the interdependence between the various domains. |
|
Using the ICF framework, orthopaedic deformities (Body functions and structure) can prevent the child from being placed in sitting and standing positions, where most functional activities occur (Activity), even where postural devices are available for support. Exclusion from age-appropriate community activities, for example school attendance (Participation), is the likely result, indicating compromised functional health. This population warrants special attention to achieve the United Nations’ (UN) third Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) for 2030, to ‘ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages’ (UNDESA 2015:6).
Limiting MSK complications is critical to optimise activity and participation opportunities for children with severe CP living in RLSs. Although this requires input from a multi-disciplinary team, specific manual techniques for this purpose traditionally fall within the scope of rehabilitation therapists, which may be a scarce resource in RLSs. Strategies to develop competence in preventing complications within existing rural health structures and within the home are thus warranted.
The value of partnering with primary caregivers to deliver home-based intervention programmes (HBIPs) for chronic conditions is increasingly being recognised even in high-income countries (HICs), where caregivers are trained in the required interventions, then supported and coached by medical professionals (Akhbari Ziegler & Hadders-Algra 2020; Beckers et al. 2020). Adopting this model to manage children with severe CP in RLSs, essential evidence-based interventions aimed at limiting commonly occurring MSK sequelae may be provided by caregivers and/or trained community healthcare workers (CHWs) within the child’s natural environment (ICF domain of Environmental factors). With this aspect adequately addressed, a repertoire of functional activities for the child can be developed (ICF domains of Activity and Participation).
The overall aim of this scoping review was to describe the literature over the last two decades that addresses prevention of MSK complications in children with partially-, or non-ambulant CP (GMFCS levels III-V) that may potentially be used by caregivers in an RLSs, as part of an HBIP.
Specific objectives were to identify:
- Clinical guidelines for interventions and modalities designed for this purpose and evaluate each recommendation for feasibility in RLSs.
- Existing HBIPs designed for this purpose and to consider factors affecting programme effectiveness.
Research methods and design
The broad, exploratory nature of our investigation lent itself to a scoping review, which was guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR)1.
Search terms included four concepts: (1) CP in children, (2) musculoskeletal complications, (3) prevention or mitigation and (4) community-based programmes. Preliminary searches revealed little original research in this area during the last decade. Thus, limits were extended retrospectively to 01 January 2001, and searches were run on PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Health Source: Nursing/Academic Edition, Africa-Wide Information, Web of Science Core Collection and SciELO. Grey literature was identified from Primo, BASE, Clinical Key, EThOS, Google Scholar and Semantic Scholar, as well as professional society websites, associations and bibliographies of relevant publications (Van Aswegen, Richards & Morrow 2024:S1).
Records were imported into the 2020 Covidence web-based collaboration software platform.2 One researcher (S.v.A.) screened title and abstracts, and full-text review for eligibility was conducted independently by two researchers (S.v.A. and B.M.), with conflicts resolved by discussion.
Inclusion criteria
Articles and clinical guidelines with full-text availability, published in the English language between 01 January 2001 and 31 December 2021, that described therapeutic interventions and programmes designed for the prevention of MSK complications for children aged 0–18 years with severe CP (GMFCS levels III–V) were eligible. There was no limit on sample size or study design. Where more than one version of a clinical guideline was retrieved, only the most recent was included.
Exclusion criteria
- Study population: < 50% related to severe CP diagnosis defined as having limited or no independent ambulation, that is, GMFCS levels III-V; < 50% were 0–18 years of age and studies focussing on unilateral CP, which typically classify as GMFCS level I or II.
- Settings: Interventions requiring specialised environment or expertise not widely available.
- Surgical, radiological and/or pharmacological interventions.
- Outcomes: Not primarily related to prevention or control of MSK complications in CP or HBIPs not including the prevention or control of MSK complications.
- Publication type: Protocols, letters, non-expert reviews, summaries and commentaries and/or editorials.
- Full text of the article is not available.
One researcher (S.v.A.) performed two independent extractions and critical appraisals for each article, at a minimum of 8 weeks apart to improve accuracy and consistency. Study details were then extracted onto a spreadsheet recording first author, year of publication, country or region of origin, sample size, age, diagnosis and GMFCS level, other participants, study design, main subject or concept, intervention, outcomes measured, main results or recommendations, adverse effects and identified gaps in knowledge (Van Aswegen et al. 2024:S2). The level of evidence of each record was noted, based on the work of Ackley et al. (2008), and methodological appraisal was applied using the AGREE-II assessment for clinical guidelines3 and Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) checklists for the other studies.4 The JBI checklist and AGREE-II scores were reflected as very low, low, moderate and high, based on percentage of agreement with quality criteria for each record (Van Aswegen et al. 2024:S3, S4, S5).
Ethical considerations
As this review formed part of a larger study involving human research, ethical approval was obtained for the whole project from the University of Cape Town’s Human Research Ethics Committee with reference no. 024/2022.
Results
We identified 1943 records. After de-duplication, 1481 records were screened by title and abstract and 173 underwent full-text review. A total of 116 records were excluded as detailed in the PRISMA diagram (Figure 2), which left 57 records for the final review.
 |
FIGURE 2: Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) flow diagram. |
|
The 57 results could be grouped as follows:
- clinical practice guidelines (CPG) for children with CP (6 articles, 3 of which were systematic reviews [SR])
- 24-hour postural management (24-h PM), supported seating and standing (27 articles)
- stretching interventions (12 articles)
- programmes and aspects of community-based HBIPs from RLSs (12 articles).
Studies in each group were represented chronologically in graphs to illustrate research trends, study type and focus (Van Aswegen et al. 2024:S6).
Clinical practice guidelines and systematic reviews on clinical recommendations for children with cerebral palsy
Three CPGs came from national or regional health websites in HICs – the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) in the United Kingdom (NICE 2012), the Waikato District Health Board (WDHB) in New Zealand (WDHB 2014) and the American Academy for Cerebral Palsy and Developmental Medicine (AACPDM) (Paleg et al. 2019). Two comprehensive SRs of reviews of therapeutic interventions aimed to guide clinical practice (Morgan et al. 2021; Novak et al. 2020), and one article was an SR of guidelines for the care of persons with CP, initiated by the WHO (Damiano et al. 2021). All guidelines adhered to AGREE-II and PRISMA criteria.
The NICE guideline (NICE 2012) and AACPDM Care Pathway (Paleg. et al., 2019) focussed on general medical management of CP and central hypotonia in children. No specific regimens or home programmes were given, but conditional recommendations for interventions targeting the body structures were included. The WDHB guided therapeutic management, providing detailed recommendations for assessment, interventions and equipment needs, all stratified into GMFCS levels and age bands.
One comprehensive SR addressed evidence-based medical and therapeutic interventions for children with CP, but recommendations for children with GMFCS levels IV and V were few and of questionable feasibility in RLSs (Novak et al. 2020).An SR on early intervention guidelines (Morgan et al. 2021) focussed on improving motor function and could make few recommendations in 0- to 2-year-olds for prevention of MSK complications. The WHO review (Damiano et al. 2021) only identified five official guidelines for CP of all ages, and relevant recommendations referenced guidelines already retrieved. Table 1 summarises the recommended non-medical modalities for prevention of MSK complications from each of the included sources.
TABLE 1: General recommendations for prevention of mitigate musculoskeletal complications from the retrieved clinical practice guidelines and systematic reviews. |
From the results in Table 1, the conditional recommendations for the prevention or control of MSK complications for children with severe CP were:
- 24-hour postural management, including lying, seating and standing (5 articles); using sleep systems (4 articles, 1 of these implied); supported and/or adapted seating (5 articles, 2 of these implied); standing using relevant equipment (6 articles).
- Orthotics or splints: For lower limbs (LLs) to prevent loss of range of motion (ROM) in joints and to assist with standing and walking (5 articles) and for upper limbs (ULs) to prevent ROM loss in the wrists (3 articles).
- Stretching (3 articles).
The next sections discuss the evidence that informs the implementation and application of these recommendations as well as aspects to consider for successful home-based interventions.
24-hour postural management, supported seating and standing
At a Mac Keith Multidisciplinary meeting held in 2006, postural management was defined as ‘a planned approach encompassing all activities and interventions which impact on an individual’s posture and function’ (Gericke 2006). For this review, we developed a narrower definition, that is, ‘the supportive positioning of the whole body in lying, sitting and standing to preserve normal MSK alignment and to provide central support for functional activity’. This would include supported standing but exclude a focussed modality such as applying an orthosis.
Of the 27 articles included in this section, all were from HICs, except one from Malaysia (Htwe et al. 2016). Included articles were 18 cohort or quasi-experimental studies (Capati et al. 2020; Gibson et al. 2009; Holmes et al. 2003; Htwe et al. 2016; Kim et al. 2013; Macias-Merlo et al. 2015, 2016; Martinsson & Himmelmann 2011, 2021; Mol et al. 2012; Paleg et al. 2021; Porter et al. 2008; Picciolini et al. 2009, 2016; Pountney et al. 2002, 2009; Tornberg & Lauruschkus 2020; Vekerdy 2007), seven SRs (Chung et al. 2008; Gmelig Meyling et al. 2018; Humphreys et al. 2019; Paleg et al. 2013; Pérez-de la Cruz 2017; Pin 2007; Wynn & Wickham 2009), an expert consensus (Gericke 2006) and a narrative review (Kittelson-Aldred & Hoffman 2017).
Interventions in all three positions were represented in the studies, almost half reporting on standing programmes alone. Outcomes most often related to hip displacement, followed by lower limb ROM. Several sources reported on functional impact of postural management regimens and qualitative measures, for example, ease of performing daily activities, and sleep quality when using sleep systems. Table 2 and Table 3 provide detailed results of studies involving 24-h PM regimes and lying, seating and standing interventions.
TABLE 2: Application of postural management: 24 h regimes, lying and seating interventions. |
TABLE 3: Application of postural management: Supported standing interventions. |
For children in GMFCS levels IV and V, the expert consensus from 2006 recommended lying or sleeping with postural support at night, sitting from 6 months of age and supported standing from 12 months (Gericke 2006) The researchers found no revisions or updates for this regimen.
Unsupported holding, feeding and lying positions for children with GMFCS level V tended to result in spinal, pelvic and hip deformities in up to 95% of subjects (Porter et al. 2008). However, using a consistent 24-h PM approach in lying, seating with hip abduction for 5 to 6 h daily (Kim et al. 2013) and/or standing from the age of 18 months and upwards for 30–90 min per day significantly controlled and/or improved hip migration percentage (MP) and reduced frequency of spinal orthotic prescription, Botulinum toxin injections (BoNT) and hip surgery indications at age 5 (Gmelig Meyling et al. 2018; Pérez-de la Cruz 2017; Picciolini et al. 2016, 2009; Pountney et al. 2002, 2009).
Weak and inconclusive evidence from three studies reported the effects of using commercial sleep systems. Two reported significant reduction of hip MP after a minimum of 6 months and up to several years of consistent use, and hip ROM improved along with MSK comfort levels. Thermal comfort, however, was sometimes reduced, and parents required training to use these systems (Humphreys et al. 2019; Wynn & Wickham 2009). Caregivers reported that sleeping systems did not cause significant sleep disturbance, especially if used night and day (Mol et al. 2012).
Seating that incorporated a 3-point force system (Holmes et al. 2003), or modular or moulded contours with optional tilt, produced a decreased spinal Cobb angle and improved thoracic posture when used for at least 4 h per day (Chung et al. 2008). In addition, caregivers from two studies found trunk-supported seating eased everyday caregiving and improved the child’s social interaction (Chung et al. 2008; Vekerdy 2007).
Supported standing regimes were reported to significantly improve a range of outcomes, especially when commenced as early as 9 months of age (Paleg et al. 2013). Standing for 30 to 90 min per day for 3 to 7 days per week for young children from the age of 12 months up to 5 years significantly decreased hip MP at 5 years of age, the effects enhanced with additional total hip abduction up to 60° (Htwe et al. 2016; Macias-Merlo et al. 2016; Martinsson & Himmelmann 2011, 2021; Paleg et al. 2013). Standing for at least 30 min per day for at least 3 days per week also improved bone mineral density (BMD) significantly in the LLs and spine, especially when combined with whole body vibration (Paleg et al. 2013; Pin 2007) and reduced spasticity in the LLs for up to 35 min post intervention, which in turn led to a less scissored gait pattern (Macias-Merlo et al. 2015; Paleg et al. 2013; Pin 2007; Tornberg & Lauruschkus 2020). Standing for 45-60 min per day 3-5 days per week for 8-15 months was found to significantly increase LL ROM, which led to improvements in gait, social interaction and decreased burden of care (Capati et al. 2020; Gibson et al. 2009; Macias-Merlo et al. 2015; Martinsson & Himmelmann 2021; Paleg et al. 2013; Tornberg & Lauruschkus 2020).
Stretching and splinting interventions
Twelve articles, mostly from HICs, were included in this section, but only three were primary studies – a case-controlled time series from 2003 (Fragala et al. 2003) and two quasi-experimental trials (Laessker-Alkema & Eek 2016; Uzun Akkaya & Elbasan, 2021). The rest included six SRs (Autti-Rämö et al. 2006; Craig et al. 2016; Eldridge & Lavin 2016; Groppe et al. 2012; Wiart et al. 2008), two narrative reviews (Physiopedia 2016; Wilton 2003) and an expert consensus (Lannin et al. 2011). Within the five SRs that included manual stretching, there was considerable overlap in the sources, with several studies repeatedly cited (Craig et al. 2016; Eldridge & Lavin 2016; Groppe et al. 2012; Pin et al. 2006; Wiart et al. 2008). Overall, the evidence was scarce.
Although stretching is widely regarded as an essential part of conservative joint range maintenance in CP (Wiart et al. 2008), the researchers found no clear consensus on the scope of ‘stretching’ techniques nor any standardised stretching dosage regimes. All sources described manual (intermittent) stretching of a joint or muscle by a therapist, maintained for up to 60 s per repetition. Most sources also included at least one of the following: manual stretching with the addition of electrical stimulation (ES); active stretching with child participation; positional or sustained stretching, lasting 15 min or more and using equipment such as a standing frame or an orthosis; intramuscular stretching (similar to massage) and serial casting where a series of rigid casts were applied to a joint for progressive lengthening of shortened tissues. As the use of orthotics in children with severe CP is largely for joint range maintenance (Lannin et al. 2011), five studies reporting on orthotic use were included here. Outcomes included calf muscle spasticity, LL ROM and gross motor function. Characteristics of studies on stretching interventions are presented in Table 4.
TABLE 4: Effects of stretching interventions for children with severe cerebral palsy. |
There is overall weak and conflicting evidence for stretching interventions. Manual stretching interventions appear to be less effective for preventing deformities than sustained, positional stretching (Craig et al. 2016; Pin et al. 2006). Fragala et al. (2003) found that periods of non-intervention from a school-based manual stretch routine of 3 × 60 s per structure, taking place once to twice per week, produced inconsistent changes in LL ROM. The addition of ES to the antagonist during stretching significantly increased ROM and reduced spasticity (Groppe et al. 2012). Uzun Akkaya and Elbasan (2021) reported transient reduction in calf muscle spasticity after just 10 min of manual stretching, both with and without concurrent massage. No adverse effects were reported.
Wilton (2003), Autti-Rämö et al. (2006), Groppe et al. (2012) and Craig et al. (2016) all suggested that joint ROM may be maintained or increased in all limbs and spasticity reduced by an intensive serial casting programme if sustained for at least 3 weeks.
Positional stretching for 20 min using an orthotic in sitting or using a stander for 30 min at least three times per week for at least 8 weeks may be effective to increase LL ROM and may reduce calf muscle spasticity for up to 35 min after the stretch (Craig et al. 2016; Groppe et al. 2012; Laessker-Alkema & Eek 2016; Lannin et al. 2011; Pin et al. 2006). Wilton (2003) recommended wrist and hand orthotics be used at night or for 3–5 h per day to control deformities where spasticity is moderate to high although all other studies found inconclusive evidence of efficacy for ULs.
Although no stretching interventions resulted in improved motor function for the child, improved flexibility appeared to assist with symmetry in sitting (Physiopedia 2016) and ease of care when performing ADLs (Laessker-Alkema & Eek 2016). Adverse effects included hindrance of hand function while wearing UL orthotics (Autti-Rämö et al. 2006; Lannin et al. 2011; Wilton 2003) and bruising, skin breakdown, sleep disturbance, joint swelling and muscle cramps were reported in a few patients using LL orthoses (Craig et al. 2016; Laessker-Alkema & Eek 2016).
Home-based intervention programmes
No studies were found evaluating the effectiveness of HBIPs to prevent MSK complications in severe CP. Twelve articles addressed the population of interest and aspects of HBIPs that influenced success.
Six were conducted in LMICs or involved RLSs. Three were reviews (Branjerdporn et al. 2021; Lord et al. 2018; Paleg 2005), and nine were primary studies, comprising eight qualitative studies (Bischof & Chirwa 2011; Colver et al. 2012; Halvarsson et al. 2010; Novak et al. 2012; Krüger & Sello 2008; Lillo-Navarro et al. 2015; Naidoo et al. 2019; Rezaie & Kendi 2020) and one quasi-experimental trial (Zuurmond et al. 2018). Studies explored essential programme components, training needs of caregivers and primary health workers, determinants of successful programme implementation and the impact on child development. Table 5 provides further details of each study.
TABLE 5: Home-based intervention programmes for cerebral palsy that include prevention of mitigate musculoskeletal complications: Content, impact and environmental factors. |
Three South African studies reported on caregiver and CHWs’ views on their capacity for identifying and managing CP in the community. Outcomes included knowledge of the condition, practical handling skills and pain caused during activities of daily living (ADL). A facility-based study found a moderately high prevalence of pain in children and young adults with severe CP during daily care activities, which they observed to be directly influenced by their handling techniques (Bischof & Chirwa 2011). Community healthcare workers required specific training in CP screening and clear referral pathways and protocols for further management (Naidoo et al. 2019). Caregivers desired better knowledge of the condition, practical training for everyday routines and ongoing involvement in support groups with health professionals and respected members of their communities (Krüger & Sello 2008).
Limited evidence suggests that, in spite of poverty and low education levels of caregivers, parent-implemented interventions in LMICs positively influenced posture, positioning, self-care, feeding and social function in children while reducing parental stress (Branjerdporn et al. 2021; Zuurmond et al. 2018), and that a positive, equipped and informed environment improved overall participation of children with CP at home, in school and the community (Colver et al. 2012).
Factors affecting fidelity and adherence to HBIPs by caregivers were the presence of trusting relationships between child, caregiver and therapist, and establishing skills and coping strategies (Lord et al. 2018). Priorities from caregivers included evidence-based interventions, the element of fun, the incorporation of the programme into daily routines and written instructions with demonstration (Lillo-Navarro et al. 2015). Caregivers prioritised programme flexibility and mobility goals for the child, as well as ongoing support for monitoring and programme adaptation over time (Halvarsson et al. 2010). Priorities from therapists included effective communication with families, joint goal setting and equipping in CP clinical skills and resources (Rezaie & Kendi 2020). Zuurmond et al. (2018) found that monthly telephonic or face-to-face check-ins with caregivers and a group chat via social media for therapists and/or CHWs were effective support mechanisms for their community-based programme.
Discussion
The dearth of eligible high-quality empirical research in this review is notable, an observation also acknowledged in a recent overview of effective interventions for CP (Liguori et al. 2023). The ethical and methodological challenges of conducting primary research in this population were evident with limitations including non-randomisation, small sample sizes and low generalisability, hence, the few and broad nature of published guidelines that include prevention of MSK complications in severe CP. However, if pre-emptive strategies are not in place, we know from clinical experience that progressive MSK complications are common in CP and potentially devastating, which concurs with the recent findings of Tenaglia et al. (2022) and Krarup et al. (2024) who strongly advocate a comprehensive, targeted approach to limit MSK complications in children with CP. Although we found overall weak support for the use of 24-h PM for the prevention and control of hip displacement, scoliosis and musculoskeletal contractures (Chung et al. 2008; Damiano et al. 2021; Gericke 2006; Morgan et al. 2021; NICE 2012; Novak et al. 2020; Novak et al. 2020; Paleg et al. 2019; Pountney et al. 2002, 2009; WDHB 2014; Wynn & Wickham 2009), the importance of PM regimes in limiting deformities and promoting function is increasingly being recognised (Paleg & Livingstone 2022).
Considering that physical interventions aimed at limiting MSK complications require continuity and assimilation into everyday routines, being most effective when carried out daily or several times a week (Autti-Rämö et al. 2006; Craig et al. 2016; Gmelig Meyling et al. 2018; Gibson et al. 2009; Groppe et al. 2012; Laessker-Alkema & Eek 2016; Macias-Merlo et al. 2015, 2016; Martinsson & Himmelmann 2021; Paleg et al. 2013; Picciolini et al. 2016; Pin 2007; Pin et al. 2006; Tornberg & Lauruschkus 2020), it is reasonable to equip primary caregivers to perform them, where feasible, especially where formal health services are limited. Potential challenges in an RLSs would include the early identification of infants at risk so that interventions can be implemented in the home from as young as 4 months of age (Paleg 2005; Paleg & Livingstone 2022) and the availability and affordability of requisite equipment for lying, seating and standing, which is considerable for children in GMFCS levels IV and V (Novak et al. 2012).
Although efficacy of manual stretching techniques for preventing deformities has not been established, regular positional or sustained stretching regimes appear to maintain and improve ROM and temporarily reduce spasticity, which would likely facilitate positioning, daily care (e.g. perineal hygiene) and function (Craig et al. 2016; Groppe et al. 2012; Laessker-Alkema & Eek 2016; Pin et al. 2006). While serial casting and ES require an expert setting, manual and positional stretches would be feasible options for RLSs.
In RLSs, it is common to find relatively poor, less educated caregivers struggling to cope with the care of their child with CP, which they may experience as stressful and demanding. Often the perceived burden of care relates to difficulties with ADLs such as feeding and general lack of knowledge and confidence. We have shown that modifying the environment through parent-implemented approaches are acceptable and effective to improve child outcomes (Colver et al. 2012), ease of care and parental stress levels (Branjerdporn et al. 2021; Zuurmond et al., 2018), especially when accompanied by adequate training and support (Halvarsson et al. 2010; Lord et al. 2018; Naidoo et al. 2019). In RLSs, the inexperience and knowledge gaps of primary health workers in identifying families in need and supporting them may compound these issues. As these health workers are integral to successful implementation and sustainability, it is important to equip them with early identification tools, provide clear protocols for referral and train them in the HBIPs so they can better support families.
Research gaps
Existing studies of PM have focussed on the role of sitting and standing programmes in prevention and control of the hip and LL deformities. Neuromuscular scoliosis is another serious, common complication of severe CP (Hagglund et al. 2018) that 24-h PM may influence; yet, supporting research is lacking. Studies on sleeping systems have been limited to commercially available options. The efficacy of low-cost equipment for lying positions should be a research priority, particularly in children classified as GMFCS levels IV and V who spend a significant portion of the day in lying.
Evidenced-based stretching protocols should be developed, including dosage and stretching modalities for different treatment goals. In our review, there were few reported adverse effects; however, some MSK discomfort during stretching might be expected. The contribution of any stretching to relieve or exacerbate pain is an important consideration and is likely to affect programme adherence. Other questions should be considered about the psycho-sensory aspects of touch during manual stretches and if it can be effectively combined with massage. These questions warrant further research.
Our review found very little research into content, efficacy of and adherence to HBIPs in RLSs that include physical modalities designed to prevent MSK complications in severe CP. Further research could help identify structural and social determinants of successful programmes, establish effective protocols and provide ways to quantify participation and functional outcomes.
Strengths and limitations
This review charts the existing literature over the past 20 years on manual interventions for limiting MSK complications in severe CP, including general CPGs, and efficacy of individual modalities and home programmes. The existing knowledge and evidence gaps were highlighted to help prioritise future research for populations living in RLSs.
The search was broad, using multiple sources including online platforms and included quality rating to support any recommendations made. Using a non-categorical diagnostic approach might have yielded useful studies involving other diagnoses and increased our evidence base. Our limit on language may have excluded some relevant studies from LMICs but was necessary owing to limited translation services. Several of the retrieved articles were, however, originally published in other languages. Initial screening, extraction and quality appraisal by a single researcher could have resulted in selection bias, especially with such a broad scoping purpose. However, this risk was mitigated by establishing clear and detailed exclusion criteria a priori and bringing in a second, independent reviewer for full-text review. Measures were taken to improve intra-rater reliability.
Conclusion
There is a paucity of high-level research and clinical recommendations for safe, feasible and effective home-based interventions to reduce MSK complications in conditionally or non-ambulatory children with severe CP living in resource-poor environments. This requires urgent redress if we are to meet the SDG-3 to ‘ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages’ (UNDESA 2015), which would include all socio-geographic contexts.
In the meantime, we believe that if clinical reasoning and diligent monitoring are applied, the existing evidence for 24-h PM, stretching and splinting can be used to guide the development of a context-specific home-based programme to improve the outcomes for children with severe CP in RLSs.
Acknowledgements
This article represents part of the author’s thesis entitled ‘Developing a home-based programme to mitigate musculoskeletal complications in children with severe cerebral palsy in resource-limited settings in South Africa: A modified Delphi study’ to be submitted towards the degree of Master of Philosophy in Maternal and Child Health in the Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, University of Cape Town, South Africa, with supervisor Brenda Morrow and co-supervisor Mark Richards.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no financial or personal relationships that may have inappropriately influenced them in writing this article.
Authors’ contributions
S.v.A. was responsible for funding acquisition and the conceptualisation, visualisation, investigation, methodology, data curation and analysis of this study. S.v.A. also contributed to writing the original draft and editing the review article. B.M. contributed resources, the conceptualisation, methodology and investigation of the study. B.M. was the main supervisor and involved with the validation, writing and editing of the review article. M.R contributed to the conceptualisation, validation and co-supervised the study. M.R. also proofread and refined the review article.
Funding information
The student researcher was supported by a research grant from the Department of Paediatrics and Child Health Research Committee at a University in the Western Cape.
Data availability
Data and supplementary content are available in the Zivahub open access repository (Van Aswegen et al. 2024) and can be accessed with the URL: https://doi.org/10.25375/uct.23097311.v1.
Disclaimer
The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and are the product of professional research. The article does not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of any affiliated institution, funder, agency or that of the publisher. The authors are responsible for this article’s results, findings and content.
References
Ackley, B., Ladwig, G.B., Swan, B.A. & Tucker, S.J., 2008, Evidence-based nursing care guidelines: Medical-surgical interventions, Elsevier, St. Louis, MO.
Akhbari Ziegler, S. & Hadders-Algra, M., 2020, ‘Coaching approaches in early intervention and paediatric rehabilitation’, Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology 62(5), 569–574. https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.14493
Autti-Rämö, I., Suoranta, J., Anttila, H., Malmivaara, A. & Mäkelä, M., 2006, ‘Effectiveness of upper and lower limb casting and orthoses in children with cerebral palsy: An overview of review articles’, American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 85(1), 89–103. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.phm.0000179442.59847.27
Beckers, L., Geijen, M.M.E., Kleijnen, J., Rameckers, E.A.A., Schnackers, M.L.A.P., Smeets, R.J.E.M. et al., 2020, ‘Feasibility and effectiveness of home-based therapy programmes for children with cerebral palsy: A systematic review’, BMJ Open 10(10), e035454. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035454
Bischof, F.M. & Chirwa, T.F., 2011, ‘Daily care activities and hip pain in non-ambulatory children and young adults with cerebral palsy’, Journal of Pediatric Rehabilitation Medicine 4(3), 219–23. https://doi.org/10.3233/prm-2011-0177
Branjerdporn, N., Benfer, K., Crawford, E., Ziviani, J., Boyd, R.N. & Sakzewski, L., 2021, ‘Efficacy of early interventions with active parent implementation in low-and-Middle income countries for young children with cerebral palsy to improve child development and parent mental health outcomes: A systematic review’, Disability and Rehabilitation 44(23), 6969–6983. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2021.1989063
Cans, C., De-la-Cruz, J. & Mermet, M.-A., 2008, ‘Epidemiology of cerebral palsy’, Paediatrics and Child Health 18(9), 393–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paed.2008.05.015
Capati, V., Covert, S.Y. & Paleg, G., 2020, ‘Stander use for an adolescent with cerebral palsy at GMFCS level with hip and knee contractures’, Assistive Technology 32(6), 335–341. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2019.1579268
Chung, J., Evans, J., Lee, C., Lee, J., Rabbani, Y., Roxborough, L. et al., 2008, ‘Effectiveness of adaptive seating on sitting posture and postural control in children with cerebral palsy’, Pediatric Physical Therapy 20(4), 303–317. https://doi.org/10.1097/PEP.0b013e31818b7bdd
Colver, A., Thyen, U., Arnaud, C., Beckung, E., Fauconnier, J., Marcelli, M. et al., 2012, ‘Association between participation in life situations of children with cerebral palsy and their physical, social, and attitudinal environment: A cross-sectional multicenter European study’, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 93, 2154–2164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2012.07.011
Couper, J., 2002, ‘Prevalence of childhood disability in rural Kwazulu-Natal’, South African Medical Journal 92(7), 549–552, viewed 25 November 2021, from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12197199.
Craig, J., Hilderman, C., Wilson, G. & Misovic, R., 2016, ‘Effectiveness of stretch interventions for children with neuromuscular disabilities: Evidence-based recommendations’, Pediatric Physical Therapy 28(3), 262–275. https://doi.org/10.1097/PEP.0000000000000269
Damiano, D.L., Longo, E., Carolina de Campos, A., Forssberg, H. & Rauch, A., 2021, ‘Systematic review of clinical guidelines related to care of individuals with cerebral palsy as part of the World Health Organization efforts to develop a global package of interventions for rehabilitation’, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 102(9), 1764–1774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2020.11.015
Donald, K.A., Kakooza, A.M., Wammanda, R.D., Mallewa, M., Samia, P., Babakir, H. et al., 2015, ‘Pediatric cerebral palsy in Africa’, Journal of Child Neurology 30(8), 963–971. https://doi.org/10.1177/0883073814549245
Eldridge, F. & Lavin, N., 2016, ‘How effective is stretching in maintaining range of movement for children with cerebral palsy? A critical review’, International Journal of Therapy & Rehabilitation 23, 386–395. https://doi.org/10.12968/ijtr.2016.23.8.386
Fragala, M.A., Goodgold, S. & Dumas, H.M., 2003, ‘Effects of lower extremity passive stretching: Pilot study of children and youth with severe limitations in self-mobility’, Pediatric Physical Therapy 15(3), 167–175. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.pep.0000083045.13914.d4
Gericke, T., 2006, ‘Postural management for children with cerebral palsy: Consensus statement’, Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology 48(4), 244. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0012162206000685
Gibson, S.K., Sprod, J.A. & Maher, C.A., 2009, ‘The use of standing frames for contracture management for nonmobile children with cerebral palsy’, International Journal of Rehabilitation Research 32(4), 316–323. https://doi.org/10.1097/MRR.0b013e32831e4501
Gladstone, M., 2010, ‘A review of the incidence and prevalence types and aetiology of childhood cerebral palsy in resource poor settings’, Annals of Tropical Pediatrics 30(3), 181–196. https://doi.org/10.1179/146532810X12786388978481
Gmelig Meyling, C., Ketelaar, M., Kuijper, M.A., Voorman, J. & Buizer, A.I., 2018, ‘Effects of postural management on hip migration in children with cerebral palsy: A systematic review’, Pediatric Physical Therapy 30(2), 82–91. https://doi.org/10.1097/PEP.0000000000000488
Groppe, M., Mattern-Baxter, K. & Davenport, T., 2012, ‘Passive stretching and its effect on spasticity and range of motion in children with cerebral palsy: A systematic review’, Journal of Student Physical Therapy Research 5, viewed 21 January 2022, from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/260390219_Passive_Stretching_and_its_Effect_on_Spasticity_and_Range_of_Motion_in_Children_with_Cerebral_Palsy_A_Systematic_Review.
Hagglund, G., Pettersson, K., Czuba, T., Persson-Bunke, M. & Rodby-Bousquet, E., 2018, ‘Incidence of scoliosis in cerebral palsy’, Acta Orthopaedica 89(4), 223–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2018.1450091
Halvarsson, S., Asplund, R. & Fjellman-Wiklund, A., 2010, ‘From authority to coach parents’ experiences of stretching as a home programme for children with cerebral palsy’, Advances in Physiotherapy 12(4), 208–216. https://doi.org/10.3109/14038196.2010.528023
Hollung, S.J., Bakken, I.J., Vik, T. & Lydersen, S., Wiik, R., Aaberg, K.M. & Andersen, G.L., 2020, ‘Comorbidities in cerebral palsy: A patient registry study’, Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology 62(1), 97–103. https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.14307
Holmes, K.J., Michael, S.M., Thorpe, S.L. & Solomonidis, S.E., 2003, ‘Management of scoliosis with special seating for the non-ambulant spastic cerebral palsy population – A biomechanical study’, Clinical Biomechanics18(6), 480–487. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0268-0033(03)00075-5
Htwe, O., Ismail F., Joseph L. & Naicker A., 2016, ‘Hip subluxation/dislocation in children with cerebral palsy: Does Standing help?’, International Medical Journal 23, 169–172, viewed 21 January 2022, from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/268664962_Hip_Subluxation_Dislocation_in_Patients_with_Cerebral_Palsy-_Does_standing_help.
Humphreys, G., King, T., Jex, J., Rogers, M., Blake, S., Thompson-Coon, J. et al., 2019, ‘Sleep positioning systems for children and adults with a neurodisability: A systematic review’, British Journal of Occupational Therapy 82(1), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308022618778254
Kim, M.O., Lee, J.H., Yu, J.Y., An, P.S., Hur, D.H., Park, E.S. et al., 2013, ‘Changes of musculoskeletal deformity in severely disabled children using the custom molded fitting chair’, Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine 37(1), 33–40. https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.2013.37.1.33
Kittelson-Aldred, T. & Hoffman, L.A., 2017, ‘24-hour posture care management: Supporting people night and day’, Rehab Management: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Rehabilitation, 14–20, viewed 26 March 2022, from http://ezproxy.uct.ac.za/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=cin20&AN=126360712&site=ehost-live.
Krarup, L.H., Kristensen, P.K., Stisen, M.B., Nordbye-Nielsen, K. & Mechlenburg, I. et al., 2024, ‘Hip displacements and correctable scoliosis were prevalent in children with cerebral palsy registered in a Danish follow-up programme from 2010 to 2020’, Acta Paediatrica 113(2), 336–343. https://doi.org/10.1111/apa.17013
Krüger, D. & Sello, T.M., 2008, ‘Educating rural parents in South Africa about their children’s cerebral palsy: Why wait for full-service schools or resource centres?’, The International Journal of Diversity in Organizations, Communities, and Nations: Annual Review 8(2), 245–250. https://doi.org/10.18848/1447-9532/CGP/v08i02/39569
Laessker-Alkema, K. & Eek, M.N., 2016, ‘Effect of knee orthoses on hamstring contracture in children with cerebral palsy: Multiple single-subject study’, Pediatric Physical Therapy 28(3), 347–353. https://doi.org/10.1097/pep.0000000000000267
Lannin, N., Bowers, R., Ross, K., Stevens, P. & Phillips, D., 2011, ‘Orthotic management of cerebral palsy: Recommendations from a consensus conference’, NeuroRehabilitation 28, 37–46. https://doi.org/10.3233/NRE-2011-0630
Liguori, S., Young, V.M., Arienti, C., Pollini, E., Patrini, M., Gimigliano, F., 2023, ‘Overview of Cochrane systematic reviews for rehabilitation interventions in individuals with cerebral palsy: A mapping synthesis’, Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology 65(10), 1280–1291. https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.15572
Lillo-Navarro, C., Medina-Mirapeix, F., Escolar-Reina, P., Montilla-Herrador, J., Gomez-Arnaldos, F. & Oliveira-Sousa, S.L., 2015, ‘Parents of children with physical disabilities perceive that characteristics of home exercise programs and physiotherapists’ teaching styles influence adherence: A qualitative study’, Journal of Physiotherapy 61(2), 81–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphys.2015.02.014
Lord, C., Rapley, T., Marcroft, C., Pearse, J. & Basu, A., 2018, ‘Determinants of parent-delivered therapy interventions in children with cerebral palsy: A qualitative synthesis and checklist’, Child: Care, Health and Development 44(5), 659–669. https://doi.org/10.1111/cch.12592
Macias-Merlo, L., Bagur-Calafat, C., Girabent-Farrés, M. & Stuberg, W.A., 2015, ‘Standing programs to promote hip flexibility in children with spastic diplegic cerebral palsy’, Pediatric Physical Therapy 27(3), 243–249. https://doi.org/10.1097/pep.0000000000000150
Macias-Merlo, L., Bagur-Calafat, C., Girabent-Farrés, M. & Stuberg, W.A., 2016, ‘Effects of the standing program with hip abduction on hip acetabular development in children with spastic diplegia cerebral palsy’, Disability and Rehabilitation 38(11), 1075–1081. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2015.1100221
Martinsson, C. & Himmelmann, K., 2011, ‘Effect of weight-bearing in abduction and extension on hip stability in children with cerebral palsy’, Pediatric Physical Therapy 23(2), 150–157. https://doi.org/10.1097/PEP.0b013e318218efc3
Martinsson, C. & Himmelmann, K., 2021, ‘Abducted standing in children with cerebral palsy: Effects on hip development after 7 years’, Pediatric Physical Therapy 33(2), 101–107. https://doi.org/10.1097/pep.0000000000000789
Mol, E.M., Monbaliu, E., Ven, M., Vergote, M. & Prinzie, P., 2012, ‘The use of night orthoses in cerebral palsy treatment: Sleep disturbance in children and parental burden or not?’, Research in Developmental Disabilities 33(2), 341–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2011.10.026
Morgan, C., Fetters, L., Adde, L., Badawi, N., Bancale, A., Boyd, R.N. et al., 2021, ‘Early intervention for children aged 0 to 2 years with or at high risk of cerebral palsy: International clinical practice guideline based on systematic reviews’, JAMA Pediatrics 175(8), 846–858. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2021.0878
Naidoo, S., Naidoo, D. & Govender, P., 2019, ‘Community healthcare worker response to childhood disorders: Inadequacies and needs’, African Journal of Primary Health Care & Family Medicine 11(1), 1871. https://doi.org/10.4102/phcfm.v11i1.1871
NICE, 2012, Spasticity in under 19s: Management, NICE, London, viewed 22 January 2022, https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg145.
Novak, I., Morgan, C., Fahey, M., Finch-Edmondson, M., Galea, C., Hines, A. et al., 2020, ‘State of the evidence traffic lights 2019: Systematic review of interventions for preventing and treating children with cerebral palsy’, Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports 20(2), 3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11910-020-1022-z
Novak, I., Smithers-Sheedy, H. & Morgan, C., 2012, ‘Predicting equipment needs of children with cerebral palsy using the Gross Motor Function Classification System: A cross-sectional study’, Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology 7(1), 30–36. https://doi.org/10.3109/17483107.2011.556210
Paleg, G., 2005, ‘Intervening care’, Rehab Management: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Rehabilitation 18(30), 2–3.
Paleg, G., Altizer, W., Malone, R., Ballard, K. & Kreger, A., 2021, ‘Inclination, hip abduction, orientation, and tone affect weight-bearing in standing devices’, Journal of Pediatric Rehabilitation Medicine 14(3), 433–441. https://doi.org/10.3233/prm-190660
Paleg, G. & Livingstone, R., 2022, ‘Evidence-informed clinical perspectives on postural management for hip health in children and adults with non-ambulant cerebral palsy’, Journal of Pediatric Rehabilitation Medicine 15(1), 39–48. https://doi.org/10.3233/prm-220002
Paleg, G., Livingstone, R., Rodby-Bousquet, E., Story, M. & Maitre, N.L., 2019, Care pathways: Central hypotonia, AACPDM, viewed 21 January 2022, from https://www.aacpdm.org/UserFiles/file/care-pathways-central-hypotonia-print.pdf.
Paleg, G., Smith, B.A. & Glickman, L.B., 2013, ‘Systematic review and evidence-based clinical recommendations for dosing of pediatric supported standing programs’, Pediatric Physical Therapy 25(3), 232–247. https://doi.org/10.1097/PEP.0b013e318299d5e7
Palisano, R., Rosenbaum, P., Bartlett D. & Livingston M., 2007, Gross motor functional classification system – Expanded & revised, viewed n.d., from https://www.canchild.ca/system/tenon/assets/attachments/000/000/058/original/GMFCS-ER_English.pdf.
Pérez-de la Cruz, S., 2017, ‘Childhood cerebral palsy and the use of positioning systems to control body posture: Current practices’, Neurologia 32(9), 610–615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nrl.2015.05.008
Physiopedia, 2016, Orthotics in cerebral palsy, Physiopedia, viewed 24 January 2022, from https://www.physio-pedia.com/Orthotics_in_Cerebral_Palsy.
Picciolini, O., Albisetti, W., Cozzaglio, M., Spreafico, F., Mosca, F. & Gasparroni, V., 2009, ‘“Postural Management” to prevent hip dislocation in children with cerebral palsy’, Hip International 19(6_Suppl.), S56–S62. https://doi.org/10.1177/112070000901906s10
Picciolini, O., Le Métayer, M., Consonni, D., Cozzaglio, M., Porro, M., Gasparroni, V. et al., 2016, ‘Can we prevent hip dislocation in children with cerebral palsy? Effects of postural management’, European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine 52(5), 682–690, viewed n.d., from https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84999085100&partnerID=40&md5=4754c9d6ca86ec6ec6e786a3d5fd5d07
Pin, T., Dyke, P. & Chan, M., 2006, ‘The effectiveness of passive stretching in children with cerebral palsy’, Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology 48(10), 855–862. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0012162206001836
Pin, T.W., 2007, ‘Effectiveness of static weight-bearing exercises in children with cerebral palsy’, Pediatric Physical Therapy 19(1), 62–73. https://doi.org/10.1097/PEP.0b013e3180302111
Porter, D., Michael, S. & Kirkwood, C., 2008, ‘Is there a relationship between preferred posture and positioning in early life and the direction of subsequent asymmetrical postural deformity in non-ambulant people with cerebral palsy?’, Child: Care, Health and Development 34(5), 635–641. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2214.2008.00852.x
Pountney, T., Mandy, A., Green, E. & Gard, P., 2002, ‘Management of hip dislocation with postural management’, Child: Care, Health and Development 28(2), 179–85. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2214.2002.00254.x
Pountney, T., Mandy, A., Green, E. & Gard, P.R., 2009, ‘Hip subluxation and dislocation in cerebral palsy – A prospective study on the effectiveness of postural management programmes’, Physiotherapy Research International 14(2), 116–127. https://doi.org/10.1002/pri.434
Rezaie, L. & Kendi, S., 2020, ‘Exploration of the influential factors on adherence to occupational therapy in parents of children with cerebral palsy: A qualitative study’, Patient Preference and Adherence 14, 63. https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S229535
Shevell, M.I., Dagenais, L., Hall, N. & REPACQ Consortium, 2009, ‘The relationship of cerebral palsy subtype and functional motor impairment: A population-based study’, Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology 51(11), 872–877. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.2009.03269.x
Tenaglia, A., Azizi, H. & Kim, H., 2022, ‘A pediatric physiatrist’s approach to neuromuscular hip dysplasia in cerebral palsy’, Journal of Pediatric Rehabilitation Medicine 15(1), 19–24. https://doi.org/10.3233/prm-220007
Tornberg, A.B. & Lauruschkus, K., 2020, ‘Non-ambulatory children with cerebral palsy: Effects of four months of static and dynamic standing exercise on passive range of motion and spasticity in the hip’, PeerJ 8, e8561. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.8561
UNDESA, 2015, Sustainable Development Goals. Sustainable development, 2023, p. 24, viewed 23 March 2023, from https://sdgs.un.org/goals.
Uzun Akkaya, K. & Elbasan, B., 2021, ‘Acute effects of intramuscular and passive stretching on muscle stiffness and spasticity in children with cerebral palsy’, Türk Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi 32(1), 60–66. https://doi.org/10.21653/tjpr.697318
Van Aswegen, S., Richards, M. & Morrow, B., 2024, The essential elements of a home-based program to limit musculoskeletal complications in children with severe cerebral palsy living in resource-limited settings - a Scoping review, viewed n.d., from https://doi.org/10.25375/uct.23097311.v1
Vekerdy, Z., 2007, ‘Management of seating posture of children with cerebral palsy by using thoracic-lumbar-sacral orthosis with non-rigid SIDO (R) frame’, Disability and Rehabilitation 29(8), 1434–1441. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280601055691
Waikato District Health Board (WDHB), 2014, Cerebral palsy clinical practice guideline, Waikato District Health Board, Waikato, viewed 22 January 2022, from https://efisiopediatric.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/Cerebral-Palsy-Clinical-Practice-Guideline.pdf.
World Health Organization (WHO), 2002, Towards a common language for functioning, disability and health: ICF, viewed 03 June 2018, from https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/default-source/classification/icf/icfbeginnersguide.pdf.
Wiart, L., Darrah, J. & Kembhavi, G., 2008, ‘Stretching with children with cerebral palsy: What do we know and where are we going?’, Pediatric Physical Therapy 20(2), 173–178. https://doi.org/10.1097/PEP.0b013e3181728a8c
Wilton, J., 2003, ‘Casting, splinting, and physical and occupational therapy of hand deformity and dysfunction in cerebral palsy’, Hand Clinics 19(4), 573–584. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0749-0712(03)00044-1
Wynn, N. & Wickham, J., 2009, ‘Night-time positioning for children with postural needs: What is the evidence to inform best practice?’, British Journal of Occupational Therapy 72(12), 543–550. https://doi.org/10.4276/030802209X12601857794817
Zuurmond, M., O’Banion, D., Gladstone, M., Carsamar, S., Kerac, M., Baltussen, M. et al., 2018, ‘Evaluating the impact of a community-based parent training programme for children with cerebral palsy in Ghana’, PLoS One 13(9), e0202096. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202096
Footnotes
1. https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/full/10.7326/M18-0850?rfr_dat=cr_pub++0pubmed&url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori%3Arid%3Acrossref.org.
2. https://app.covidence.org.
3. https://www.agreetrust.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/AGREE-II-Users-Manual-and-23-item-Instrument-2009-Update-2017.pdf.
4. https://jbi.global/critical-appraisal-tools.
|