Original Research

Do experienced physiotherapists apply equal magnitude of force during a grade I central pa on the cervical spine?

M. Conradie, E. Smit, M. Louw, M. Prinsloo, L. Loubser, A. Wilsdorf
South African Journal of Physiotherapy | Vol 60, No 4 | a191 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/sajp.v60i4.191 | © 2004 M. Conradie, E. Smit, M. Louw, M. Prinsloo, L. Loubser, A. Wilsdorf | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 12 January 2004 | Published: 12 January 2004

About the author(s)

M. Conradie, Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, South Africa
E. Smit, Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, South Africa
M. Louw, Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, South Africa
M. Prinsloo, Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, South Africa
L. Loubser, Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, South Africa
A. Wilsdorf, Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, South Africa

Full Text:

PDF (124KB)

Abstract

Background and purpose: Physiotherapists frequently use central posterior-anterior (PA) joint mobilization techniques for assessing and managing spinal disorders. Manual examination findings provide the basis for the selection of treatment techniques. From the literature it is evident that the level of reliability varies when physiotherapists perform different mobilization techniques. Repeatability of mobilization techniques is important for better physiotherapy management. The aim of the study was to determine whether experienced physiotherapists apply equal magnitude of force during a grade I central PA mobilisation technique on the cervical spine. Another aim was to determine the variation in the magnitude of force
applied by each individual physiotherapist.
Subjects: Sample of convenience, consisting of sixteen (n=16) selected qualified physiotherapists with experience in
Orthopaedic Manual Therapy.
Methods: A grade I central PA was performed on the Flexiforce TM sensors positioned on C6 of the same asymptomatic model to measure the applied magnitude of force. Two separate measurements, each lasting 30-seconds, were obtained.
Results: The average maximum peak force applied by the majority of physiotherapists (87.5%) was between 10.95g
and 72g. The difference in the forces applied for the two measurements ranged between 0.64g and 24.4g. The Bland
Altman scatterplot determined the mean of the difference between measurement one and two, calculated for the group, was zero. When comparing the two measurements, little variation was noted in the forces applied, as well as the coefficient of variation for each physiotherapist.
Conclusion and Discussion: Current results demonstrated good intra-therapist and moderate to good inter-therapist repeatability. Further research is required to generalize results.

Keywords

joint mobilisation; postero-anterior; intra-therapist; inter-therapist; reliability

Metrics

Total abstract views: 3779
Total article views: 3328

 

Crossref Citations

1. Manual Forces Applied During Cervical Mobilization
Suzanne J. Snodgrass, Darren A. Rivett, Val J. Robertson
Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics  vol: 30  issue: 1  first page: 17  year: 2007  
doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2006.11.008

2. Inter-clinician and intra-clinician reliability of force application during joint mobilization: A systematic review
Kara S. Gorgos, Nicole T. Wasylyk, Bonnie L. Van Lunen, Matthew C. Hoch
Manual Therapy  vol: 19  issue: 2  first page: 90  year: 2014  
doi: 10.1016/j.math.2013.12.003

3. Reliability and accuracy of an expert physical therapist as a reference standard for a manual therapy joint mobilization trial
Evan J. Petersen, Stephanie M. Thurmond, Catherine A. Shaw, Kelly N. Miller, Tommy W. Lee, Jonathan A. Koborsi
Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy  vol: 29  issue: 3  first page: 189  year: 2021  
doi: 10.1080/10669817.2020.1844853

4. Effects of taping on thumb alignment and force application during PA mobilisations
Thomas Walsh, Eamonn Delahunt, Ulrik McCarthy Persson
Manual Therapy  vol: 16  issue: 3  first page: 264  year: 2011  
doi: 10.1016/j.math.2010.11.006

5. What do we know about spinal manual therapy for people with osteoporosis? A narrative review
Caitlin McArthur, Christina Ziebart, Judi Laprade
Physical Therapy Reviews  vol: 26  issue: 1  first page: 42  year: 2021  
doi: 10.1080/10833196.2020.1852906

6. Devices Used to Measure Force-Time Characteristics of Spinal Manipulations and Mobilizations: A Mixed-Methods Scoping Review on Metrologic Properties and Factors Influencing Use
Marie-Andrée Mercier, Philippe Rousseau, Martha Funabashi, Martin Descarreaux, Isabelle Pagé
Frontiers in Pain Research  vol: 2  year: 2021  
doi: 10.3389/fpain.2021.755877

7. Manual Forces Applied During Posterior-to-Anterior Spinal Mobilization: A Review of the Evidence
Suzanne J. Snodgrass, Darren A. Rivett, Val J. Robertson
Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics  vol: 29  issue: 4  first page: 316  year: 2006  
doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2006.03.006

8. The effect of real-time feedback on learning lumbar spine joint mobilization by entry-level doctor of physical therapy students: a randomized, controlled, crossover trial
Evan J. Petersen, Stephanie M. Thurmond, Sydney I. Buchanan, Diana H. Chun, Ashley M. Richey, Lauren P. Nealon
Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy  vol: 28  issue: 4  first page: 201  year: 2020  
doi: 10.1080/10669817.2019.1673953