Original Research

Assesing motor impairment of the trunk in patients with traumatic brain injury: reliability and validity of the trunk impairment scale

G. Verheyden, J. Hughes, J. Jelsma, A. Nieuwboer, W De Weerdt
South African Journal of Physiotherapy | Vol 62, No 2 | a153 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/sajp.v62i2.153 | © 2006 G. Verheyden, J. Hughes, J. Jelsma, A. Nieuwboer, W De Weerdt | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 08 January 2006 | Published: 18 February 2006

About the author(s)

G. Verheyden, Research Assistant, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium, Belgium
J. Hughes, Division of Physiotherapy, University of Cape Town, South Africa
J. Jelsma, Division of Physiotherapy, University of Cape Town, South Africa
A. Nieuwboer, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium
W De Weerdt, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium

Full Text:

PDF (32KB)

Abstract

Introduction: Literature regarding trunk assessment after Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) is limited. The Trunk Impairment Scale (TIS) is a newly developed tool which is intended to assess static and dynamic sitting balance and trunk co-ordination.

Aim: It was the aim of this study to examine the reliability and
validity of the TIS in TBI patients.

Methods: Thirty TBI subjects were recruited from within a
rehabilitation setting. Two researchers observed each subject
simultaneously, but scored independently. Each subject was
re-examined by one of the raters.

Results: Kappa and weighted kappa values for all items ranged from 0.34 to 1. All percentages of agreement were 70% or higher. Intraclass correlation (ICC) coefficients for the sub-scale scores were between 0.72 and 0.88. Test-retest and inter-rater reliability for the total TIS score (ICC) was 0.88 and 0.95, respectively. The 95% limits of agreement for the test-retest and interexaminer measurement error interval were -4,4 and -3,3, respectively. The construct validity was evaluated by means of the Spearman rank correlation coefficient between the TIS and the Barthel Index (r=0.59, p=.0007).

Discussion and conclusion: Fair to perfect item agreement was found but the reliability of certain items requires
further attention. Acceptable sub-scale and total TIS reliability and validity justify the use of the TIS in TBI treatment
and research.


Keywords

traumatic brain injury; outcome assessment; reproducibility of results

Metrics

Total abstract views: 3434
Total article views: 3653

 

Crossref Citations

1. Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Trunk Impairment Scale in people with a stroke
Jie Zhao, Janita Pak Chun Chau, Yuli Zang, Kai Chow Choi, Rong He, Yali Zhao, Xiaoqi Xiang, Qin Li, David R. Thompson
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes  vol: 19  issue: 1  year: 2021  
doi: 10.1186/s12955-021-01730-y