Review Article

Evidence of physiotherapeutic interventions for acute LBP patients

Q. Louw, L. Morris, J. Sklaar
South African Journal of Physiotherapy | Vol 63, No 3 | a137 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/sajp.v63i3.137 | © 2007 Q. Louw, L. Morris, J. Sklaar | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 08 January 2007 | Published: 09 January 2007

About the author(s)

Q. Louw, Division of Physiotherapy University of Stellenbosch, South Africa
L. Morris, Division of Physiotherapy, University of Stellenbosch, South Africa
J. Sklaar, Division of Orthopaedic Manipulative Therapy Group, South African Society of Physiotherapy, South Africa

Full Text:

PDF (47KB)

Share this article

Bookmark and Share

Abstract

Objective: To identify the current evidence for acute low back pain (LBP) treatment techniques and to amalgamate this information into a clinically applicable algorithm for South African physiotherapists.Study design: Systematic review.Methods: Computerized bibliographical databases were systematically searched during September 2006 and October 2006 for primary and secondary research reporting on the efficacy of various physiotherapeutic treatment techniques for acute LBP. A search for clinical guidelines regarding acute LBP was also undertaken. Evidence levels were allocated to the primary and secondary research retrieved. Results: Twenty-one systematic reviews, four randomized controlled trials and eleven clinical guidelines were included in this review. There is Level 1 evidence that advice to stay active, McKenzie preferential exercises and spinal manipulative therapy (up to six weeks) is beneficial in the initial treatment of acute LBP. There is level 2 evidence that stability exercises, dry needling, heat wrap with exercises, cognitive behavioural therapy, printed patient education, massage (with education and exercises), and lifestyle modification might be potentially beneficial in the treatment of acute LBP. There is level 1 evidence that bed rest should not be recommended for simple acute LBP.  Should a patient not resolve in six weeks, red and yellow flags should be re-assessed, or patient should be referred to a specialist. Outcome: Based on the current evidence, a composite algorithm was developed to assist South African physiotherapists when making treatment decisions for acute LBP. Conclusion: There seems to be a lack of evidence for the efficacy of common treatment techniques used by physiotherapists in the management of acute LBP, indicating an urgent need for physiotherapy-specific, high-quality clinical trials. It is suggested that the evidence-based algorithm that has been developed, be used in the management of acute LBP to standardize physiotherapy intervention in South Africa.


Keywords

acute low back pain; physiotherapy; systematic review; clinical guidelines

Metrics

Total abstract views: 1425
Total article views: 2917


Crossref Citations

No related citations found.