Original Research

Opinions of South African physiotherapists on gross anatomy education for physiotherapy students

Dorothy Shead, Ronel Roos, Benita Olivier, Amadi O. Ihunwo
South African Journal of Physiotherapy | Vol 75, No 1 | a1318 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/sajp.v75i1.1318 | © 2019 Dorothy Shead, Ronel Roos, Benita Olivier, Amadi O. Ihunwo | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 04 December 2018 | Published: 30 July 2019

About the author(s)

Dorothy Shead, Department of Physiotherapy, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa; and, School of Anatomical Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
Ronel Roos, Department of Physiotherapy, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
Benita Olivier, Department of Physiotherapy, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
Amadi O. Ihunwo, School of Anatomical Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa


Share this article

Bookmark and Share

Abstract

Background: Physiotherapists know the depth of gross anatomical knowledge required for safe and effective clinical practice. They can offer insightful opinions on inclusions for and teaching of an anatomy curriculum for physiotherapy students.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to gather opinions of physiotherapists as to what they perceive as necessary anatomy curricular content for undergraduate physiotherapy students and identify pedagogy that should be used.

Method: A qualitative methodology using a grounded theory approach incorporating semi-structured interviews was utilised in this study. Theoretical sampling was used to identify representative South African physiotherapists. An inductive process, using continuous manual analysis of data by two independent coders, was undertaken. Data were collapsed until themes were identified. Triangulation and other strategies for trustworthiness of data were instituted.

Results: Theoretical saturation was reached after five focus groups (n = 32). Demographical information indicated physiotherapists of all age groups and both genders working in diversified clinical areas. Seven themes were identified and incorporated information from ‘structure’, ‘content’ and ‘pedagogy’ for anatomy programmes to the psychological impact of course aspects on a student’s psyche. Vertical integration of anatomy into later preclinical years, incorporation of physiotherapists to teach anatomy, a ‘physiotherapist personality’ and ‘anatomy know how’ for clinical practice were included.

Conclusion: Opinions of physiotherapists are important in identifying curricular and teaching considerations that can be incorporated into an anatomy programme designed for physiotherapy students.

Clinical implications: Targeted anatomy education for physiotherapy students can aid learning and retention of anatomical knowledge necessary for effective and safe clinical practice.


Keywords

gross anatomy; curriculum; pedagogy; physiotherapy; physiotherapists; physiotherapy students

Metrics

Total abstract views: 59
Total article views: 52


Crossref Citations

No related citations found.