Original Research

The awareness and use of outcome measures by South African physiotherapists

G. Inglis, M. Faure, A. Frieg
South African Journal of Physiotherapy | Vol 64, No 2 | a102 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/sajp.v64i2.102 | © 2008 G. Inglis, M. Faure, A. Frieg | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 07 January 2008 | Published: 19 February 2008

About the author(s)

G. Inglis, Lecturer - Physiotherapy Department (Stellenbosch University)
M. Faure, Previous Head of Physiotherapy Department (US)
A. Frieg, Physiotherapist, Cape Town, South Africa

Full Text:

PDF (184KB)

Abstract

Physiotherapists as well as otherhealth care providers a reunder pressure to provide evidence for the effectiveness of their interventions. Therefore it has become necessary to employ standardized androbust outcome measures in clinical practice. The objective of this study was to determine the awareness of and use of outcome measures (OM’s)amongst physiotherapists in South Africa. A survey was conducted in2004 using a self-developed electronic questionnaire consisting of 18questions, both open- and closed-ended. A population-based sample consisting of 1102 members on the email address list of the South Africa Society of Physiotherapy (SASP) was used. Data analysis consisted ofboth descriptive statistics and qualitative analysis for the open-endedquestions. The response rate was 15.2% (n=168). Ninety one percent of respondents reported to have heard of OM’s while 84% reported using OM’s regularly. Impairment related measures were predominantly in use. The two main themes that emerged from therespondents’comments related to reasons forusing OM’s were “effective clinical practice”(82%) and “evidence-basedpractice” (15%). Time constraints and lack of sufficient knowledge in the use of OM’s, were cited as obstacles tousing OM’s. These findings have implications forthe South African physiotherapy community in terms of education,continuous professional development (CPD) and future research in the usage frequency of OM’s.

Keywords

outcome measures; awareness; use of outcome measures; evidence-based practice; South Africa; physiotherapists

Metrics

Total abstract views: 4939
Total article views: 3044

 

Crossref Citations

1. A survey on the use of outcome measures by musculoskeletal physiotherapist’s in India
Swekha Mehta, Kate Grafton
Physiotherapy Theory and Practice  vol: 30  issue: 2  first page: 110  year: 2014  
doi: 10.3109/09593985.2013.826313

2. Facilitators and barriers to using neurological outcome measures in developed and developing countries
Marika Demers, Andréanne K. Blanchette, Aditi A. Mullick, Akash Shah, Kathleen Woo, John Solomon, Mindy F. Levin
Physiotherapy Research International  vol: 24  issue: 1  year: 2019  
doi: 10.1002/pri.1756

3. Are patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) useful in low back pain? Experiences of physiotherapists in primary health care in Sweden
Eva Rasmussen-Barr, Cecilia Lindqvist, Sara Östhols, Carina Boström
Musculoskeletal Science and Practice  vol: 55  first page: 102414  year: 2021  
doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2021.102414

4. Physical function and activity of patients after open abdominal surgery: a prospective cohort study comparing the clinimetric properties of two outcome measures
Marelee Fourie, Heleen van Aswegen
Physiotherapy  vol: 123  first page: 142  year: 2024  
doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2024.02.001

5. Current knowledge and practice of post-stroke unilateral spatial neglect rehabilitation: A cross-sectional survey of South African neurorehabilitation physiotherapists
Chuka I. Umeonwuka, Ronel Roos, Veronica Ntsiea
South African Journal of Physiotherapy  vol: 78  issue: 1  year: 2022  
doi: 10.4102/sajp.v78i1.1624

6. A Survey on the Use of Outcome Measures during Physical Therapy Interventions by Physical Therapists in Korea
Jae-Hyun Lim, So-Yeong Kim, Byeong-Geun Kim
Healthcare  vol: 11  issue: 22  first page: 2933  year: 2023  
doi: 10.3390/healthcare11222933